Conflict-Affected Cultures and Societies
DC 9 My Side Before All Else - Generating Sacreds And Absolutes
SOME DYNAMICS OF CONFLICT-AFFECTED CULTURES AND SOCIETIES 9 DC 9: MY SIDE BEFORE ALL ELSE- GENERATING SACREDS AND ABSOLUTES When we put sacred positions and beliefs before relation.
Source: Nurturing Hope, Conflict-Affected Cultures and Societies, May 22 Final The Understanding Conflict Trust - Nurturing Hope - 4 Conflict Affected Cultures and Societies.pdf, pages 57-61
SOME DYNAMICS OF CONFLICT-AFFECTED CULTURES AND SOCIETIES 9 DC 9: MY SIDE BEFORE ALL ELSE- GENERATING SACREDS AND ABSOLUTES When we put sacred positions and beliefs before relationships with different others those not sharing our beliefs are shut out. Such actions mobilise ‘our people’ into a homogenous crowd where unanimity is demanded and people become intolerant of any insiders who express different points of view. “My people” and ‘my place’ comes before all else. Sacred and absolutes become ‘lightning conductors’ for emotions associated with identify. SACREDS AND ABSOLUTES Although we often behave as if not, societies are places which depend on all manner of people interdepending with one another. Often these interdependencies are not talked about until crises or pandemics. e.g. The linkages of food producers, transport drivers, food distributors and pharmaceutical producers and suppliers in the Covid pandemic.. e.g. The ways many now greet
more people in neighbourhoods in a pandemic threat and the new appreciation there is for care workers and health workers. e.g. The ‘new knowledge’ many of us gain when so many ‘national identities’ turn out to be far more diverse than has been previously acknowledged. e.g. The new research that shows that Black people from North Africa were part of the Roman colonisation of Britain since the second century.xxii Local essentialism is a dynamic that asserts the power of one ‘apparently distinct group’ and fails to recognise different others living there, in that same area. Such local essentialism works against the value of all those working to support the common good and denies different others an equal place. It asserts the growth of identity politics and sacred beliefs, beliefs that often become absolutes, un-bargainable points of identity characterized by: “Even if the other kills me, they can never take my beliefs away, I will be buried with my own people!” . Ethnocentrism is the conviction that the ways of one’s own group or tradition are better than anyone else’s.”xxiii The term ‘ethnic’ derives from it. When we are ethnocentric, we make our culture or identity more important than relationships with different people around us. When we identify with pride the groups or traditions to which we belong and assert that we will defend or fight for them, we experience what people caught up in sectarian conflict experience. When we put forward a notion of our country having one pure, monochrome identity we are being ethnocentric. In much older societies, and at other times, ethnocentrism was always part of how tribes and peoples thoughtxxiv. Arguments about who first coined the term ethnocentrism abound. However its use refers to the technical name for the view of things in which one’s own group is the centre of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it.xxv In Northern Ireland, ethnocentrism is about cultural identity and interests. On the surface it is about defending people and fighting for their safety. Deeper down it is about real or presumed interests; and still deeper it is about securing an identity at the expense of different others. We need this theme understood more widely. We are all capable of acting in this manner. We place sectarianism within a broader set of ethnocentric behaviors, because the term refers to elevating a land, territory or belief to be unassailable, a sacred or an absolute.
COMMUNITY TOO CAN BE USED AS A SACRED OR ABSOLUTE TERM-AS SUCH IT IS EXCLUDING Pavlich speaks of the often hidden and violent edges of traditional models of communityxxvi. In a contested society these violent and exclusionary edges are often very evident. Identities can become very localised, future prisons that may limit opportunity and imagination for adults and children alike. Local essentialism closes people to difference. Such dynamics feed the exclusion of cultures and a politics of ‘ethnic essentialism’6 that is ‘only my group and my place counts above all else’ . At this time, even some secure states are experiencing the growth of ethnocentric groups in their midst who are unwilling to share with different others. While ethnic Irishness or Britishness has been easily tenable on the fringes of our historic cultures they do not reflect the growing diversity in these different countries. The emergence of local essentialism necessitates that the ethnic frontier and the metropolitan centers learn together. As citizens within an expanded Europe, there is a restorative historical healing necessary around Islamic, Christian and Jewish relations especially, as well as with all other religious faiths. Promoting good relations between people of different religious beliefs, political opinion, racial groups, sexual orientation, diverse abilities and social backgrounds are the modern challenge for citizens in all societies, if they accept it. This restorative challenge asks us if our existing cultural and political formations have the space and openness to encompass different others; or do our major traditions only want others if they assimilate into our existing ways? Such restorative spaces are opportunities to resolve the challenge of creating safety and security for all. They challenge all of us to change our behavior as well as the views we have of others whose class, religion, gender, ability, race or politics differs from ours 6 Ranjit Sondhi CBE explores ethnicity in a variety of ways. See for example his talk to the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, 2008. https://evergreenessays.blogspot.com/2006/07/indian-civilisation-is-so-rich- complex.html
DC9: MY SIDE BEFORE ALL ELSE-GENERATING SACREDS AND ABSOLUTES
INVITATION
If you feel able to, please scribble some notes or write a longer diary type entry about this topic.
REFLECT ON YOUR OWN
Sacreds tend to put positions and beliefs before relationships with others. Sacreds tend to shut out different others who may have different positions to you. Sacreds tend to mobilize ‘my people’ into one homogenous crowd where unanimity is assumed, and where there is little, if any, tolerance of any different views being expressed. Sacreds tend to be lightning conductors for deep emotions around identity. Do you have any sacred beliefs or positions? Are you aware of any in your society?
Find Your Voice
Can you recall hearing some person, or imagine someone such as yourself, expressing the following phrases? At a national or provincial level ‘There is no way they will take away my birthright!” “I will take my pure identity to my grave” ” “I will defend my people before all else” “Our flag has to be defended before all else” “Our land, our people before all else” “Our identity is a sacred thing” At a local level “Identity is sacred to us”. “This territory has to be defended” “Our culture is everything” When you hear such voices, or when you utter these words yourself, what do you think? What is most important to you or the speaker? What are the emotions you feel when they are spoken? How do such voices contribute to a more open and diverse society? Do you think, in any way, they contribute to conflict and the possibility of violence?
Can you imagine situations where you would be prepared to voice some of these statements or not? Think about your response to this.
Explore Your Reason
What motivates people to make some aspects of their identity sacred? What motivates people to make some aspects of their land or territory sacred? What motivates people to make some aspects of their beliefs sacred? What motivates people to make some aspects of their culture sacred?
Examine Your Choice
When people make land, culture, beliefs or identity a ‘sacred’ , it is a deeply felt matter. When people are prepared to fight, even die, for a flag or a symbol, that flag or symbol, for them, deep down, really means something. Choosing a symbol, a culture, an identity, a belief before all else. In what circumstances could you imagine yourself making these choices? If not, what would hold you back from doing so? The reality of a sacred symbol is that those who identify with it often are convinced that their position is right, above all else, and that the other person is fundamentally wrong. How do you choose to treat people holding fundamentally different positions to you? How do you respond to someone stating their sacred positions, excluding you from consideration?
COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITY
If you are willing now, speak about the themes above with another person or in the group you are part of. Hearing your own voice and the voices of others, what are you now learning about people holding ‘sacred beliefs’? Have you ever experienced yourself moving in the direction of holding ‘sacred’ positions? What dynamic was driving this movement? Anger? Frustration? Fear? Pride? If not, could you still imagine some situations where you would? What would your family and different friends say to you? How would you answer them?
Summary
When the land, tradition or belief people hold is put above all else- -especially above relationships with the different other in their midst-sacreds, absolutes, or un- bargainable positions are generated. Without a priority being given to the need for relationships between us, especially between parties who do not agree, open communication about working and living together becomes more difficult. When people enjoy respectful relationships with different others, the best elements of these different identities and cultures that serve the common good, can enhance all.